What drives RTW after an RTA? International research insights

Access:

Members Only

Membership Required

This content is only visible to logged-in members

Forgot Password
Duncan from Memberstack
Click "Forgot password" to get started
Memberstack 2.0 will enable 100% custom password reset UI's. Here's an example...
Step 1 of 4
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What drives RTW after an RTA? International research insights

Articles / Case Studies

Resource Updated: 

February 27, 2026

What drives RTW after an RTA? International research insights

Modise, G.L., Uys, C.J.E. & Du Plooy, E. (2025). Barriers and facilitators of return to work for loss of income claimants: Healthcare workers’ perspectives. African Journal of Disability, 14(0), a1442. 

https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1442  

This research explores healthcare workers’ experiences of the RTW process and how they collaborated (or struggled to collaborate) with the funder, employer and injured employee.

A key learning is the central role of coordination. Where the funder, injured person, clinicians and employer worked together with clear RTW guidance and aligned expectations, participants perceived better progress and more effective use of benefits. In contrast, fragmented communication and unclear roles were described as undermining momentum, confidence and decision-making throughout the claim.

If you’re supporting someone following a road traffic accident, here are some practical learnings from the study and we’d love to hear what works in your cases so we can build a bank of shared learning and case studies across the VRA:

1. Making early and purposeful contact with the employer, agreeing on what adjustments are realistic with clear review dates to avoid case drift.

2. Having a simple one-page RTW plan that everyone can follow, including the injured person, employer, funder/insurer and treating team. Keep it plain English: goals, duties, restrictions, timescales, and who owns each action.

3. Outlining recommendations on capacity, tolerances and job demands (what the person can do safely and consistently.

4. If the job is heavy/manual, consider modified duties, job carving, redeployment, transitional roles and, where needed, a retraining pathway. 

5. Regularly explore confidence, expectations, perceived injustice, fear of flare-up and motivation, then build these into the plan (e.g., graded exposure, reassurance, problem-solving and self-efficacy goals).

‍

If you try one of these approaches in practice, consider sharing a short anonymised case example with the VRA (what you did, what helped, what you’d do differently) to add to the member-led case study library.

‍

Additional Categories:

What drives RTW after an RTA? International research insights

Articles / Case Studies

Resource Updated: 

February 27, 2026

What drives RTW after an RTA? International research insights

Modise, G.L., Uys, C.J.E. & Du Plooy, E. (2025). Barriers and facilitators of return to work for loss of income claimants: Healthcare workers’ perspectives. African Journal of Disability, 14(0), a1442. 

https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1442  

This research explores healthcare workers’ experiences of the RTW process and how they collaborated (or struggled to collaborate) with the funder, employer and injured employee.

A key learning is the central role of coordination. Where the funder, injured person, clinicians and employer worked together with clear RTW guidance and aligned expectations, participants perceived better progress and more effective use of benefits. In contrast, fragmented communication and unclear roles were described as undermining momentum, confidence and decision-making throughout the claim.

If you’re supporting someone following a road traffic accident, here are some practical learnings from the study and we’d love to hear what works in your cases so we can build a bank of shared learning and case studies across the VRA:

1. Making early and purposeful contact with the employer, agreeing on what adjustments are realistic with clear review dates to avoid case drift.

2. Having a simple one-page RTW plan that everyone can follow, including the injured person, employer, funder/insurer and treating team. Keep it plain English: goals, duties, restrictions, timescales, and who owns each action.

3. Outlining recommendations on capacity, tolerances and job demands (what the person can do safely and consistently.

4. If the job is heavy/manual, consider modified duties, job carving, redeployment, transitional roles and, where needed, a retraining pathway. 

5. Regularly explore confidence, expectations, perceived injustice, fear of flare-up and motivation, then build these into the plan (e.g., graded exposure, reassurance, problem-solving and self-efficacy goals).

‍

If you try one of these approaches in practice, consider sharing a short anonymised case example with the VRA (what you did, what helped, what you’d do differently) to add to the member-led case study library.

‍

Additional Categories:

Relevant Resources

Discover the latest related resources

Based on current viewing you may also be interested in these...

Late diagnosis in senior professionals - Deeper Learning

Access:

Members Only

We are increasingly seeing scenarios where individuals are receiving a diagnosis late in adulthood.

Late diagnosis in senior professionals - Case Study

Access:

Open Resource

Diagnosed at 56, retrained at 57

The Value of Challenging Limiting Belief

Access:

Open Resource

Case study by VRA member Stuart Miller

Contact
Get In Touch

Got a question or need some help? Please feel free to contact a us and a member of the team will get back to you asap!

By filling out this form, you agree to the terms laid out in our privacy policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.